Thursday, November 17th, 2005

Monthly Newsletter

Volume 5 Issue 7 


Doctors Criticize California Workers' Comp

 

"Although workers' comp overhaul has reduced costs, it has created an environment "that is hostile to physicians and often harmful to the patients they serve," according to a report released by the medical association."

[Advisor Home]

 

Fed up with red tape and delayed reimbursements by insurers, doctors surveyed by the California Medical Association vow to reduce or stop treating injured workers in the wake of changes to the state workers' compensation system, according to the Sacramento Bee.

Although workers' comp overhaul has reduced costs, it has created an environment "that is hostile to physicians and often harmful to the patients they serve," according to a report released by the medical association.

CMA officials cited many physician complaints about insurance carriers missing legal deadlines for decisions on medical tests and treatment, payments routinely delayed and rulings made by nonmedical specialists.

The problems, the group said, could spark more legal wrangling and cost insurers and employers more money in the long term. The group is urging the Schwarzenegger administration to step up policing of insurance companies and calling on lawmakers to re-examine practices of 973 newly created doctor networks.

"We have significant problems. We're going to see premiums go back to where they were. The administration is going to have to do something about it," Jack Lewin, association CEO, said during a news conference in Sacramento.

Insurance industry officials disagreed with survey findings. Carrie Nevans, acting administrative director of the state Division of Workers' Compensation, told the paper that steps already are in place to address the issues, including new financial penalties for delaying insurance payments.

The division has commissioned the University of California -Los Angeles to evaluate the legislative changes and their effects on treatment to injured workers. The study should be completed this summer.

Nicole Mahrt, spokeswoman for the American Insurance Association, told the paper that the complaints arise from "growing pains being felt by doctors used to the old system. Doctors are frustrated by trying to follow the new rules. The existing rules and regulations are adequate to protect patients and doctors."

Insurance officials said the association's survey was too limited to draw solid conclusions.

The CMA report was compiled from responses by 250 physicians who handle workers' compensation cases. Officials said the results were not a scientific sampling, yet confirm many issues raised by state physicians.

Among the findings:
*63 percent of doctors intend to cut back on workers' compensation cases. Of that percentage, a third plan to quit treating injured workers.

*Only 1 percent reached an insurance company claims reviewer on the first telephone call; 68 percent of doctors said they needed to make multiple attempts.

*40 percent said half their requests for treatment were denied because of new medical guidelines. But 43 percent of those surveyed reported a quarter of their denials were overturned when appealed.

Doctors were critical of the new networks, claiming they focus more on getting physicians to agree to fee discounts instead of following a set of standard medical practices. They also complained about out-of-state physicians reviewing cases without having all the medical records.

Because of increasing costs to treat job-related injuries in the late 1990s and early 2000s, lawmakers passed a series of laws designed to lower medical treatment and benefit costs by imposing new fee schedules, uniform guidelines on treatment and benefit payments.

Last year, a law was passed requiring doctors to follow uniform medical guidelines when evaluating a permanent disability. The law also established a new HMO-style medical provider network and a formula to calculate permanent disability payouts to workers who never fully recover from injuries, according to the paper..

As a result, costs dropped 50 percent while insurers' profits climbed, according to the paper. At the same time, insurers have cut premiums paid by employers by more than 30 percent on average since the first changes were passed.

Critics have maintained the changes have come at the expense of injured workers and have made paperwork more cumbersome.

(article taken from The Insurance Journal)