|
With few
exceptions, workers’ compensation insurance
rates are in decline across the country.
However, declines in workers’ compensation
rates are historically just the calm before
the next storm. Usually businesses will pay
back all their “savings,” and then some,
as the workers’ comp cost cycle moves to the
next phase.
The cycle
maintains a predictable pattern:
* Public
outcry from business leaders triggers
legislative reforms.
* Insurance
companies increase competitive efforts, which
produces price wars.
* Businesses
“shop for the best deal.”
* Lower
prices lead to complacency as employers lose
focus on injury prevention and cost
containment.
* Claim costs
do not fall in relation to the reduced rates.
Employers suffer from increased experience
modification factors.
* Legislative
reforms erode or prove ineffective in
addressing real cost drivers and abuses in the
system.
* Insurance
company profits dwindle; “low-ball deals”
go away.
* Employers
are left with fewer choices, higher experience
modification factors and higher costs.
* A renewed
outcry restarts the cycle.
Relying
exclusively on legislative reforms and the
insurance marketplace for stable cost
reduction is a fool’s errand. While reforms
can help in the short term, driving down
workers’ compensation costs in the long term
requires a proactive approach.
The first
step is to understand that workers’
compensation insurance functions more like a
credit line than insurance, financing injury
costs through the policy. The experience
rating plan, an integral component of the
final cost of workers’ compensation
insurance, is a method for tailoring the cost
of insurance to the individual characteristics
of an employer. Therefore, employers can
manage expenses through cost saving programs.
However, the plan cuts both ways, and high
injury costs are translated into higher
insurance costs.
Actual
payroll and loss data for the individual
employer are analyzed — usually over the
latest available three years — and compared
to similar businesses to calculate the
experience modification factor. An employer
with better-than-average injury expenses
receives a credit, thus reducing the premium.
On the other hand, employers with
worse-than-average injury costs will carry a
debit rating and pay more.
Due to the
inner workings of the plan, it is difficult
for employers to lower their experience
modification factors during a declining rate
cycle. The plan expects that if rates go down,
so should injury costs. If injury costs fail
to decline in proportion to rates, then
experience modification factors increase,
usually wiping out any savings from the rate
reduction. Employers may actually find their
costs going up even though premiums have gone
down.
To avoid
this, employers must be vigilant and proactive
in reducing injury expenses. Ultimately, an
employer’s injury costs have a far greater
impact than reforms and rate decreases. This
shifts the responsibility of cost reduction
directly to the employer.
But
employers, often unaware of processes that can
dramatically improve outcomes, feel helpless
in managing injury costs. It often takes an
act of faith before discovering that the
strategies and methods for controlling
workers’ comp costs will work.
Reducing
injury costs can be broken down into two
primary categories, what to do before and
after an injury occurs.
The key steps
that employers must take before an injury
occurs include:
* Select and
train an injury coordinator.
* Establish a
return-to-work program.
* Hire people
fit for the job.
* Establish a
relationship and get commitments from your
primary care physician.
* Train
supervisors on what to do and say when an
injury occurs.
* Address
human resource issues before an injury occurs.
Steps to take
after an injury occurs include:
* Follow a
written, repeatable, step-by-step process.
* Return the
injured employee to work as soon as medically
possible, even if in a modified work capacity.
* Maintain
positive communication with the employee and
the doctor.
* If an
employee is not recovering according to
expectations, address additional underlying
causes of the disability.
One of the
major mistakes that employers make is to hand
over too much responsibility to the insurance
company in managing injury costs. Insurance
companies are neither positioned nor capable
of doing this job alone, primarily since their
involvement is usually after the fact.
Employers are
keenly aware that maintaining a safe workplace
is the foundation of prevention. However, too
many businesses rely entirely on traditional
loss control engineering.
The most
effective way to drive down workers’
compensation costs over the long term is for
employers, medical professionals and employees
to make the right decisions and do the right
things at the right time. No government entity
or insurance company, or even the free market
system, will ever produce more beneficial
long-term results.
|